Back to Reference Library
farriery
2005
Case Report
Verified

Assessment of the ultrasonographic characteristics of the podotrochlear apparatus in clinically normal horses and horses with navicular syndrome.

Authors: Grewal, McClure, Booth, Evans, Caston

Journal: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Summary

# Editorial Summary Navicular syndrome remains a complex diagnosis in equine practice, often identified through exclusion rather than definitive imaging findings. Grewal and colleagues used standardised transcuneal ultrasonography to characterise the normal podotrochlear apparatus in seven sound horses and compare these findings with 28 horses diagnosed with navicular syndrome, first validating their approach through necropsy correlation in two additional horses. Whilst objective measurements of soft tissue structures showed no significant differences between groups, qualitative ultrasonographic changes were consistently identified in affected horses, including navicular bursitis, dystrophic mineralisation within the deep digital flexor tendon and impar ligament, insertional changes at the DDFT origin, impar ligament desmitis, and remodelling of the navicular bone's flexor cortex. These findings suggest that transcuneal ultrasound can provide valuable diagnostic clarity in horses presenting with caudal heel pain, moving beyond lameness localisation to identify the specific structures involved and inform more targeted therapeutic or management interventions. For farriers and veterinarians managing navicular cases, this technique offers an objective method to track degenerative changes over time and evaluate response to treatment, though interpretation requires familiarity with the characteristic pathological features rather than reliance on simple measurements alone.

Read the full abstract on PubMed

Practical Takeaways

  • Transcuneal ultrasound is a reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating navicular syndrome—use it to identify bursal inflammation, DDFT changes, and impar ligament involvement that correlate with clinical caudal heel lameness
  • Normal measurements alone don't diagnose navicular disease; focus on subjective findings like bursitis, mineralization patterns, and cortical bone changes visible on ultrasound
  • This imaging approach helps differentiate navicular syndrome components, allowing more targeted management and prognosis discussions with owners

Key Findings

  • No significant differences in podotrochlear apparatus measurements between normal horses and those with navicular syndrome, but subjective ultrasonographic differences were detected in diseased horses
  • Ultrasonographic findings in navicular syndrome included navicular bursitis, dystrophic mineralization of DDFT and impar ligament, DDFT tendonitis and insertional tenopathy, impar ligament desmitis, and cortical changes of the navicular bone flexor surface
  • Transcuneal ultrasonographic approach successfully identified and allowed measurement of podotrochlear soft tissue structures with necropsy confirmation in validation horses
  • Ultrasonographic evaluation of the hoof is useful for determining causes of caudal heel pain and characterizing navicular syndrome components in horses

Conditions Studied

navicular syndromenavicular bursitisdeep digital flexor tendon lesionsimpar ligament desmitiscaudal heel pain