Back to Reference Library
farriery
1990
Expert Opinion
Verified

Immobilization of glucose oxidase and peroxidase and their application in flow-injection analysis for glucose in serum.

Authors: Guo, Mo, Li

Journal: Applied biochemistry and biotechnology

Summary

# Editorial Summary Glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase were chemically bound to a glass matrix using glutaraldehyde cross-linking, creating an enzyme column capable of detecting blood glucose concentrations in a rapid, automated flow-injection analysis system. The immobilised enzymes retained substantial activity (700–800 U/g for glucose oxidase and 300–400 U/g for peroxidase) and demonstrated excellent analytical performance, with linearity across clinically relevant glucose ranges (20–1000 mg/dL), recovery rates of 95.4–103.5%, and within-batch precision of 0.8–2.2%. Notably, a single enzyme column remained functional for over two months whilst processing 50 samples daily—equivalent to analysing 100+ samples within an hour—with between-batch imprecision ranging from 2.2–4.2%, meeting standards for clinical laboratory analysis. Whilst this 1990 work predates modern point-of-care glucose metres in equine practice, the underlying enzyme-immobilisation principles remain relevant for understanding glucose detection methodologies and may inform development of high-throughput screening systems for equine metabolic assessment, particularly where repeated sampling is required for conditions such as equine metabolic syndrome or insulin dysregulation.

Read the full abstract on PubMed

Key Findings

  • Glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase were successfully immobilized on alkylamine controlled pore glass achieving 700-800 U/g and 300-400 U/g activity respectively
  • Flow-injection analysis system demonstrated linear response for glucose detection from 20-1000 mg/dL with 95.4-103.5% recovery
  • Immobilized enzyme column maintained functionality for over 2 months with 50 assays per day, enabling analysis of more than 100 samples per hour
  • Within-batch and between-batch imprecision were 0.8-2.2% and 2.2-4.2% respectively, indicating good analytical precision