Assessment of movement asymmetry in horses without saddle, saddled, and ridden by different riders in a straight line
Authors: A. Rodrigues, M. S. Azevedo, Ricardo Pozzobon
Journal: Ciência Rural
Summary
# Editorial Summary Movement asymmetry in horses represents a critical indicator of underlying lameness or dysfunction, yet the relative contributions of equipment and rider skill to observable movement patterns remain poorly characterised in the literature. Rodrigues and colleagues evaluated twenty Criollo horses in training using inertial measurement units (IMUs) during trotting in straight lines across three conditions: unsaddled, saddled, and ridden by two different operators, quantifying head and pelvic movement symmetry through vector analysis and peak-to-peak differential measurements. Whilst most kinematic parameters showed no significant difference between conditions—including vector sum, minimal head displacement differential, and maximal/minimal pelvic displacement differential—one rider demonstrated a statistically significant effect on maximal head movement asymmetry compared to the unsaddled and saddled-only states. These findings suggest that whilst saddles themselves may not substantially alter detectable movement asymmetries in trained horses, individual rider characteristics can measurably influence head carriage patterns during locomotion, implying that rider-related biomechanical factors warrant consideration in clinical movement assessment and that standardised rider protocols may be necessary when using objective gait analysis for lameness evaluation. The work highlights both the utility and limitations of IMU-based assessment in differentiating between equipment and horsemanship variables that affect equine movement.
Read the full abstract on the publisher's site
Practical Takeaways
- •Rider technique and balance can measurably influence head movement symmetry in horses—assess your own position and consistency if you notice asymmetrical movement
- •Saddle fit alone did not create significant movement asymmetries in this cohort, suggesting other factors (rider skill, lameness) should be investigated first
- •Objective motion capture analysis can detect rider-induced movement changes that may not be visible to the naked eye during routine training
Key Findings
- •No significant difference in objective movement measurements (VECTOR SUM, DIFF MIN head, DIFF MAX/MIN pelvis) between unsaddled, saddled, and ridden conditions
- •One rider demonstrated statistically significant differences in head movement (DIFF MAX) compared to other conditions, indicating rider influence on head symmetry
- •Inertial measurement units detected subtle movement asymmetries that varied with rider type despite overall symmetry metrics remaining consistent